refactor(ui): share static API and MCP parameter cards

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

API and MCP parameter editors duplicated the same name/type header and description-card styling. They now use EMCN FieldCard, which shares its frame and body with CollapsibleCard while keeping a non-interactive, always-open header. Existing description controls, values and callbacks are preserved.

Colors, borders, corners, body spacing and badge placement stay the same. Long names use the standard fade and full-value tooltip; MCP settings names align to the other cards at 14px instead of 15px, making that header 2.5px shorter in the browser comparison. Existing collapsible cards retain their appearance and behavior.

Validation: all 26 workspace type/lint checks, import-specifier resolution, mandatory API validation, 355 EMCN tests and 45 relevant consumer tests passed. The external conformance audit removes all three targeted findings and adds none. Twelve field-control subtrees are unchanged. Isolated light/dark browser comparisons cover the migrated cards, long labels, actions and keyboard collapse/reopen; live API saves and MCP deployments were not exercised.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
docs	Ready	Preview	Sep 23, 2026 2:15am UTC

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge; no actionable regressions or outstanding rule violations were identified.

Summary

The PR consolidates static API and MCP parameter editors around a new shared FieldCard, reuses its frame and body in CollapsibleCard, standardizes several icon actions and field-mode toggles, and preserves specialized compact action geometry where needed.

• Adds an always-open, non-interactive FieldCard with shared card framing and overflow handling.
• Migrates API and MCP parameter-description cards without changing their values or callbacks.
• Extracts a reusable FieldModeToggle and adopts standardized icon-button sizing across workflow editor controls.
• Adds coverage confirming that static field-card content remains visible and non-collapsible.

Diagram

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
  A[FieldCardFrame] --> B[FieldCard]
  A --> C[CollapsibleCard]
  D[FieldCardContent] --> B
  D --> C
  B --> E[API parameter editors]
  B --> F[MCP parameter editors]
  C --> G[Existing collapsible workflow cards]

Loading

_{Reviews (3) · Last reviewed commit: "fix(ui): preserve specialized tiny actio..."}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 7 files

Confidence score: 5/5

• Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
• No files require special attention.

_{Re-trigger cubic}

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

@cubic-dev-ai Please review the current parameter-card changes.

[cubic-dev-ai]

@cubic-dev-ai Please review the current parameter-card changes.

@BillLeoutsakosvl346 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 7 files

Confidence score: 5/5

• Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
• No files require special attention.

_{Re-trigger cubic}

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

Before / after visual comparison

API and MCP deployment parameter shells reuse FieldCard. These representative pairs retain the existing fields, surfaces and density.

Left = before; right = after.

Rendered component fixtures with application CSS and local data, rather than authenticated product-page screenshots. These are representative visual examples, not end-to-end behavior coverage.

The earlier MCP-settings density proposal is deliberately omitted; it is not the final treatment.

Current PR head checked at posting: de83615667.

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

@greptile

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

[cubic-dev-ai]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@BillLeoutsakosvl346 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

[cubic-dev-ai]

All reported issues were addressed across 21 files

<sub>Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic</sub>

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

@greptile

[BillLeoutsakosvl346]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

[cubic-dev-ai]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@BillLeoutsakosvl346 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 19 files

Confidence score: 5/5

• Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
• No files require special attention.

_{Re-trigger cubic}